Debate Analysis Worksheet
Analyze and evaluate arguments, evidence, and rhetorical techniques used in debates.
Includes
Standards
Topics
Debate Analysis Worksheet
Name:
Date:
Score:
Carefully read the following debate transcript (or watch a debate) and answer the questions that follow. Pay close attention to the arguments, evidence, and rhetorical strategies used by each speaker.
Debate Topic: Should social media companies be held responsible for the spread of misinformation?
Speaker A (Affirmative): 'Social media platforms have become primary sources of news for millions. With great power comes great responsibility. When these platforms allow demonstrably false information to proliferate, they directly contribute to public confusion and harm. For example, during the recent health crisis, false cures and conspiracy theories spread like wildfire, causing real-world consequences. Holding these companies accountable would incentivize them to implement more robust fact-checking and content moderation policies.'
Speaker B (Negative): 'While the spread of misinformation is a serious issue, holding social media companies legally responsible creates a dangerous precedent. Who determines what is 'misinformation'? This could lead to censorship and a chilling effect on free speech. Furthermore, these platforms are merely conduits for user-generated content. Expecting them to police every post is technologically infeasible and financially crippling. The responsibility ultimately lies with individuals to critically evaluate information and with educators to foster media literacy.'
1. What is Speaker A's primary claim in the debate excerpt?
Social media companies should regulate all user content.
Social media companies must be held responsible for misinformation.
Misinformation is not a serious problem on social media.
Individuals are solely responsible for misinformation.
2. Which of the following is a counter-argument presented by Speaker B?
Social media platforms are too powerful.
Holding companies responsible would lead to censorship.
Fact-checking is already robust on platforms.
Misinformation causes real-world harm.
3. Speaker A uses the phrase 'With great power comes great ' to support their argument.
4. Speaker B argues that holding social media companies responsible could create a dangerous for free speech.
5. Identify one piece of evidence or an example used by Speaker A to support their claim.
6. Explain Speaker B's argument regarding the technological feasibility of policing all content on social media platforms.
7. Speaker A believes that individuals are solely responsible for evaluating information critically.
True
False
8. Speaker B suggests that holding companies accountable could lead to more robust fact-checking.
True
False
9. Analyze the effectiveness of the arguments presented by both Speaker A and Speaker B. Which speaker do you find more persuasive and why? Support your answer with specific details from the debate excerpt, discussing the types of evidence used, rhetorical strategies, and potential weaknesses in their arguments.